At a time when many policy makers are concerned primarily with children’s cognitive development and how they do on standardized tests, educators from around the country gathered in Amherst, Massachusetts, to reaffirm the importance of educating the whole child and to share effective ways to do so. The two-day conference, the first of its kind organized by NEFC, focused on using the Responsive Classroom approach schoolwide as a way to promote children’s academic, social, and emotional growth.
“In the midst of the demands from NCLB, block scheduling, and even world events, empowering our youth to be their best whole selves still matters.” —Clifton Taulbert, conference keynote speaker and author of Eight Habits of the Heart
Yes, academics are important, but so are social skills, NEFC executive director Roxann Kriete told attendees in her opening remarks. ” ‘Either-or’ choices are usually false choices,” Kriete said. “The question is not whether we should teach academics or teach social skills, but how to teach both. It’s not a question of either time for recess or time on task. In fact, social skills and academic skills promote each other. And often recess is the learning task.”
Held at the University of Massachusetts on July 25–26, the conference drew principals, teachers, counselors, and other staff from schools at various stages in their use of the Responsive Classroom approach. Those from schools just beginning their schoolwide implementation had opportunities to gather ideas and information from other schools. Those already on the journey learned new strategies to further their efforts and sustain momentum. Among the session presenters were educators who shared their stories of schoolwide Responsive Classroom implementation at several schools: Dame School, Four Corners Elementary, Hayshire Elementary, High Bridge Elementary, K.T. Murphy Elementary, and Penn Valley Elementary.
In sessions and keynote speeches, attendees heard the results of research into what children need so that they can develop and learn at their best. Reporting major findings from a three-year study, Sara Rimm-Kaufman, assistant professor at the University of Virginia, said that children at schools where teachers use the Responsive Classroom approach had higher reading and math test scores and showed greater gains in social skills than children at comparison schools.
Rimm-Kaufman’s study also found that teachers using the Responsive Classroom approach felt more effective with respect to discipline, were more positive about teaching, and delivered higher-quality instruction.
Keynote speaker Mary Utne O’Brien, executive director of the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) and research professor of psychology and education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, cited brain research showing strong connections between social and emotional well-being and cognitive development. O’Brien also cited school-based studies showing that schools using social and emotional learning (SEL) initiatives see lower teacher turnover, a more trusting adult community, and increased student learning. SEL initiatives, she said, create a “platform for instructional excellence.”
Also a keynote speaker, Fay E. Brown, associate research scientist and director of child and adolescent development for the School Development Program at Yale’s Child Study Center, shared brain research findings showing how children grow and develop along six critical pathways: physical, cognitive, psychological, social, ethical, and language. Good teaching requires attention to all six pathways. “Children,” she said, quoting child development expert James Comer, “are not just brains on sticks. We need to know and teach the whole child.”
Among contributors to the conference were five schools that have made significant strides toward schoolwide implementation of the Responsive Classroom approach: Dame School, Four Corners Elementary, Hayshire Elementary, High Bridge Elementary and K.T. Murphy Elementary (see below to read profiles of some of these schools). Counselors, teachers, and principals from these schools, along with other presenters and keynote speakers, offered ideas that can help schools just beginning to take the Responsive Classroom approach schoolwide as well as those well on their way. Here are some of those ideas.
“At the end of the day, culture and climate will be essential to the success of any school,” said keynote speaker Clifton Taulbert. Peppering his talk with stories from his childhood as a son of Mississippi sharecroppers, Taulbert inspired the audience to take personal action to help propel children to excellence. “Community will not show up unless you bring it,” he said.
Taulbert and other presenters emphasized that a strong and positive community enables students to learn and adults to teach. What “community” looks like differs from school to school, but in every school with a strong community, students feel known, safe, wanted, and able to learn no matter where they are in the school.
In a well-attended session, members of Four Corners Elementary School of Greenfield, Massachusetts, shared what their school community feels like after implementing the Responsive Classroom approach for several years. The panel of parents, staff, and students remarked on the pleasure of being in a school where students are welcomed and welcoming, inquisitive and respectful, and where teachers have a common sense of purpose and philosophy. The schoolwide approach at Four Corners includes consistent rules in classrooms and common areas; ongoing, active practicing of these rules; all-school meetings and other schoolwide learning opportunities; and family-friendly parent practices such as holding meetings in families’ homes if needed to accommodate their schedules.
Session presenters Karen Casto and Marcia Bradley, former principals of schools using the Responsive Classroom approach, made one point with particular passion: The first step toward sustaining a caring community for students is developing a strong sense of community among the adults. “If you jump into all-school initiatives before the adults are a community, you will get resistance,” said Casto. She and others spoke of the importance of cultivating common norms and values among staff, building group ownership of initiatives, and providing structures and routines to help adults get to know and learn from each other. For specific ways to accomplish these broad aims, see “Success in the Field” above.
Several elementary schools that have been using the Responsive Classroom approach schoolwide were showcased at the conference. Here, four schools tell their stories of Responsive Classroom implementation.
Location: Concord, NH
Grades: PreK–2
Student body: 350; 12% ESL; 40% free or reduced-price lunch
Began Responsive Classroom initiative: 2002
Presenters: Ed Barnwell, principal; Barbara Hemingway, coordinator; Linda Stephenson, guidance counselor; Summer Turner, kindergarten teacher
Until about five years ago, we were ineffective and inconsistent in our discipline approach, relying almost exclusively on reactive, punitive, externally motivating policies and procedures to deal with problematic student behavior. Consequently, many of our students were not making the social and academic improvements we believed they could, and should, be making. Removing students from classrooms for disruptive behaviors became the norm (as many as twelve per day during the worst period). There was little sense of community and a lack of common beliefs among the school’s adults. Morale was low, and staff were getting more and more discouraged.
We all knew we needed to do something to solve this crisis, beginning with a more proactive and positive discipline approach. Eventually, after investigating various approaches, visiting schools, and taking introductory workshops, we chose to go with the Responsive Classroom approach. We began by funding six staff in Responsive Classroom I training through a grant. Next, we formed a School Leadership Team as part of our involvement in the New Hampshire Best Schools Initiative. The team applied for, and received, a three-year federal Comprehensive School Reform grant to allow all staff to receive training (a One-Day Introductory Workshop, the Responsive Classroom I Week-Long Institute, or the Responsive Classroom II Week-Long Institute, as appropriate).
Since beginning our Responsive Classroom work, we’ve made great strides toward developing a school culture that is calm and respectful—a culture in which discipline problems are far less frequent. Each year, we try to get better at one or more elements of our Responsive Classroom implementation. We continue to make significant changes in our schoolwide practices as we work to become a more responsive school community.
Location: York, PA
Grades: K–3
Student body: 410; 18% minority; 2% ESL; 19% free or reduced-price lunch
Began Responsive Classroom initiative: 1997
Presenters: Carla Gabert, kindergarten teacher; Matt Miller, assistant principal; Barbara Snare, principal; Lori Wiltshire, counselor
The first Responsive Classroom component we tried was Morning Meeting, and it has now become the “soft landing place” from which we launch each school day. We’ve built our Responsive Classroom schoolwide implementation upon our success with Morning Meeting. In Morning Meeting we actively reinforce the skills children need to do well academically and socially. Similarly, actively teaching and reinforcing academic and social skills has become the underlying foundation for all we do at Hayshire.
We continually emphasize being specific about behavioral expectations and using supportive teacher language. In managing problem behaviors, we’ve kept our focus on plans for success with individual students. Using the “Green Circle” program (a human relations education program designed to promote positive intergroup relationships) in our guidance program helped us extend the Responsive Classroom philosophy.
Our principal and counselor have been constant supports. Also critical to our success is teachers’ belief the Responsive Classroom approach makes a difference. Not only do students respond positively to the approach, but parents notice and appreciate the school’s emphasis on teaching positive behavior.
Location: High Bridge, NJ
Grades: K–5
Student body: 300; high percentage of children with special needs; 3% ESL; 11% free or reduced-price lunch
Began Responsive Classroom initiative: 2003
Presenters: Lynn Hickey, first grade teacher; Carol Howell, principal; Lauren Richardson, first grade teacher
Our principal had attended a One-Day Introductory Workshop and a Responsive Classroom I Week-Long Institute in a previous district. At our school, she began by purchasing several Responsive Classroom professional resources and, with our school’s guidance counselor, sharing small aspects of the approach during the 2003–2004 school year.
In February 2004, we hired an NEFC consultant to facilitate a One-Day Introductory Workshop onsite, and that summer several teachers attended a Week-Long Institute. These teachers became our “core group,” who would help to guide our school in its Responsive Classroom implementation. That summer, the core group revised our teacher handbook to reflect what they learned during the Week-Long Institute. They also developed our yearly theme to incorporate the social skills emphasized in the Responsive Classroom approach: cooperation, assertion, responsibility, empathy, and self-control.
Early on, several teachers began holding Morning Meetings in their classrooms, and on the opening day of school in the fall of 2004, we held our first staff meeting in a Morning Meeting format. As a staff, we developed our Hopes and Dreams for the school year and displayed them on a bulletin board outside of our main office. Teachers guided their classes in developing their classroom rules and then all the classes and teachers together created a set of school rules and displayed them on posters around the school. The rules read, “At High Bridge Elementary School we take care of ourselves, take care of others, take care of our environment, and take care to do our best work.”
Since then, the staff has continued working together on putting Responsive Classroom principles and practices into action, sharing successes and struggles at faculty meetings and learning together through book study groups. The principal and guidance counselor worked with cafeteria aides to revamp lunchtime procedures. And after learning about all-school meetings and visiting a school during one of their meetings, we now hold these all-school events regularly throughout the year.
In January 2006, we hired an NEFC consultant to spend the day at our school modeling Morning Meetings and Guided Discovery, as well as holding follow-up discussion groups. This refresher was a very positive and rewarding day for our staff. Our schoolwide Responsive Classroom implementation is a work in process, but we’re progressing well toward our goal.
Location: Stamford, CT
Grades: K–5
Student body: 490; 41% ESL; 56% free or reduced-price lunch; 50% of students attend preschool
Began Responsive Classroom initiative: 1996
Presenters: Toni D’Agostino, first grade teacher; Michele Sabia, staff developer
From the beginning of our Responsive Classroom implementation, we envisioned the Responsive Classroom as a schoolwide approach to teaching and learning. As the first few teachers began attending workshops and institutes, other teachers caught their excitement and also wanted to learn, so they began reading Responsive Classroom literature and observing their colleagues who were already using some of the elements.
Slowly, we began adding schoolwide initiatives. These included Morning Meeting in all classrooms, all-school meetings, and a schoolwide discipline policy that emphasized the consistent use of a firm, kind, and respectful approach to handling inappropriate behavior. We also revised our lunch schedule to make time for an organized play period.
To build our adult community, we established study groups and organized faculty and PTO meetings using the Morning Meeting format. Another important initiative was our all-school field trip. It’s become an annual tradition that does much to strengthen our sense of ourselves as a strong, inclusive school community.
We need to work harder at consistently following the procedures outlined in our schoolwide discipline policy. On a daily basis, we’ll be emphasizing using logical consequences appropriately and using teacher language to remind or redirect students whose behavior is beginning to go off track.
We want to provide more support for our adult community by providing ongoing follow-up coaching to our teachers who have attended Responsive Classroom institutes. We also want to support our teachers in including daily Academic Choice lessons.
Another important goal is training guest teachers, parents, and volunteers in Responsive Classroom principles and practices.
The K.T. Murphy team members view their implementation of the Responsive Classroom approach schoolwide in terms of five interconnected structures.